Gloom & Doom an unnecessary NeoCon hell

An open letter to all Israelis (& their sympathizers) over 40. Why over 40? By then the reality of spin & lies by the media has become apparent. Before the 40’s principles and convictions may be strong. But there is no understanding of the strength of an enemy. For those that are over 40 and still identify with principles and no understanding of the adversaries strength, then you are the Jews greatest enemy. You speak with the hubris to conquer. With the logic that some sacrifice is required to achieve the greater goal ( of biblical truth ). And what keeps you afloat is an ability to subdue the weak, whether they be Palestinians, Iraqis or your own independent thinkers. Incidentally the overwhelming military advantage you have had vis a vis the Palestinians, Iraqis and Afghans proves nothing, least of all your ability to wage war on an equal. And the independent thinkers can be routed by framing and deciept, this is what you have been reduced to. Your ideals are based on a belief that spirituality is ethnic. That you are continuing a long line of ancestry. And for this it is necessary for everyone to sacrifice. But you can only control through interference in a person’s private life, and this art you have perfected. Is it from the bible? A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest. Well everyday less and less people are reading the mainstream media. The big question remains, are you going to make the peace, or end the days in a glorious fireball. For all the attention you give to making a dissidents life impossible, there are good chances you’ll be able to eliminate them all. And just in time, just when the buttons are being pressed. Or you yourselves could ask to what end is your personal and collective energies leading. Is there no way to negotiate a withdrawal from the ever expansionist neocon direction. God helps those that help themselves. God is not going to help anyone wielding a big stick. And you use your pseudo liberalism to further your aims, by the use of Gays and people of mixed ethnic origin. What about considering less control? You’ve had more control than the earth has ever witnessed before, and all that lies before us, is a collective sense of unfolding gloom and doom. Even the economic system is proving untenable. And the world is holistic, and the whole logic is up for questioning. And if you question it: Spirituality, Ethnicity, Financial systems, then maybe you’ll find a solution. Today right living has become, showing allegiance and doing the ritual. Nothing more nothing less. Just punishing those that don’t. The nightmare that is the NeoCons. Continue eavesdropping and interfering, after all it is for your ancestors that you do it! And enjoy all the ’stitching up’ that is your daily fare.

America, will you sink already?!

America, will you sink already?! Waging war on Pakistan’s tribal area. About to start a naval blockade on Iran. Trying to set up a missile system in Lithuania. Wooing Georgia and Ukraine into NATO. Ya you got support at the UN for your resolutions. But don’t you think Russia and China and Iran are aligned? Talking all the time. You have bankrupted your own country. Nor is the UK in good shape. Practiced genocide and torture. The world doesn’t need you. “Washington must learn from its past mistakes or face a valiant nation that is not afraid of ridding the region of their presence once and for all,” said Larijani on Wednesday. The US actions do not make sense, they are simply self defeating. And your allies: UK France Italy Canada Dutch, none of the people support the warring. Which makes for a boss no one likes. Now don’t get me wrong, American people are great. Then the question is: ‘what has gone wrong?’

.

In the end the Jewish empire will collapse.

Could the Jews stop the wars & the destruction of the planet? Yes at the drop of a hat they could. The ones at the top have the brains and the power. Perhaps they are worried about their own necks, meaning stopping the wars would be an admission of guilt. This unabashed craving for hegemony, to conquer others will be the undoing. Underneath the faulty hubris must be a messianic call. In the end the Jewish empire will collapse. Because they couldn’t care less about lives. And they couldn’t care less about an individuals liberty. And that includes other Jews and Israelis. So much blood, for what? And all signs from Tel-Aviv and Washington are for ‘more of the same. The Universe will teach the NeoCons that they are humans too. Even if they thought they were chosen. For the time being they will listen to noone, even though it is obvious the entire world (except for chosen mercenaries and the totally corrupted) is opposed to the White House policies.

Economist: likelihood of ban on Turkish ruling party is a disastrous mistake.

The likelihood of a ban on the ruling party is growing. It would be a disastrous mistake.

The economist makes a long list of convincing reasons why banning the AKP would be very bad for Europe. It predicts disorder and a strengthening of islamic parties and disquiet over much of the Turkish nation. The secularist elite, the economist points out, is shrinking. The question is, is there outside meddling. Is it a neocon manipulation? Are forces of industry and finance desiring a ‘regime change’. Judging from the economist we can expect it all to go haywire. It all seems similar to the PA challenging Hamas in Gaza or the Leb. government taking on Hizbollah. The AKP just won 47% of the vote, and have ruled for 6 years. The economist does not mention the size of Turkey’s military (it is huge), nor the repercussions for the west if the judiciary and military become discredited, through a failed policy. The panic amongst the secularists and the military is that the government could move towards Iran. Turkey has refused to accept any more hospitality from the IMF and the government feels it can succeed without the loans and subsequent policing of them. So we know the IMF is upset (and that includes their friends, other private and institutional investors). It smells like turmoil is on its way, and the irony is this is the government that started talks with the EU. Maybe Iran can act as peacemaker? It has a good record in Iraq and Lebanon. And Iran is cooperating with Turkey on Kurdish issues. BTW the auhoritative economist has its own intelligence unit. If this is a NeoCon triggered plan, how can they imagine to succeed when nothing else they have done has worked? From another Economist opinion piece on the same issue: To many the case is like a judicial coup: a last-ditch attempt to cling to power by an elite that refuses to share wealth and social space with a rising class of pious Turks, symbolised by the AKP. It may also further discredit the constitutional court. And this article ends on this sentence: … the threat of radical Islam in Turkey may have increased thanks to the secularists’ attack on the AKP.

The above text is from here:
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11541234&CFID=9707135&CFTOKEN=42981181

Israel without America

Bush himself said in his address to the Israeli parliament that there are those that call for distancing the US from Israel. http://morris108.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/bush-says-us-not-break-ties-with-israel/
Three major Israeli writers have just written the same thing:
Uri Avneri http://morris108.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/israels-billionaires-backers-avnery/
Gideon Levy http://morris108.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/haaretz-to-us-lets-part-as-friends/
Nahum Barnea of Yediot Ahronot http://www.prospectsforpeace.com/2008/05/mr_adelson_goes_to_israel.html
Today Rootless Cosmopolitan is also writing it is everyones go your own way time: ” Bush, like Bin Laden, on the Sidelines “
And I wrote about it a month ago. http://morris108.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/dear-israel-its-goodbye-america-time/
Frankly it means no world war. As long as there was an alliance between the Anglo Saxons: The US, Australia, the UK and Israel. It meant war after war. The relics of the Bush administration as in Condi Rice still bemoan when peaceful agreements are reached, like the one in Lebanon now.
Unfortunately, the Israelis think only the right can make peace, So all eyes are on a successor to Olmert, and people will think the Likud types are the answer.
They say Begin made the peace with Egypt, well Avnery points out Egypt had offered the peace before there was a war with Egypt.
Israel needs a humanist government that genuinely recognises the Arabs as fellow humans. Not as objects for manipulation and exploitation. To which most Israelis say, “thanks but no thanks” in other words that would take effort on everybodies part. Well that is what is needed.
And did Sharon make the peace? No he withdrew and built walls.
Of course the right can deal with the settlers better than the left. But that is no reason to make distasteful peace agreements.

Let’s start a war

Let’s start a war.
A/ When there is nothing left to lose…
B/ It would be difficult not to look guilty
A/ We are going under anyway
B/ The people wouldn’t put up with it.
A/ We can get a couple of people to sink a ship.
B/ Better to go through a recession.
A/ No they’ll be clamouring for trials and commissions.
B/ So what happens after the ship sinks.
A/ And its more than a recession that is coming.
B/ Sinking a ship isn’t enough.
A/ And this time we don’t want any internet.
B/ We need a plan.
A/ We just don’t like to see the others succeed.
B/ Our entire system is going down.
A/ Let’s make a natural disaster, a Tsunami, ya, no, well we’ll have to destroy something.
B/ A gas attack?
A/ Now you’re thinking!
B/ It’ll be the fear of God
A/ We need a low level war that steadily expands and carries on for years.
B/ Ya, better start soon.

The Jewish religion is marvelous, but

The Jewish religion is marvelous, but

It has too much political power, and has attracted fundamentalist enforcers.
Bush the son of, how very Jewish. Hillary the wife of, again how very Jewish. The power of the Jewish thought in politics and business, is what is happening. To perpetuate an image, to make the image fit the ideology is not enough.
It is a compassionate religion, it has the eye for an eye, and it also has the idea of a fresh start.
The racial nature is unacceptable and all prevalent. The notion that the Arabs are so lowly is ironic, given the Jews long history in the Arab world.
Bush in Israel, seems to be a celebration of Jewishness. To who does this benefit? The peoples of the world? No. In fact it can only bring joy to the religious Jews. It is unlikely to make Israel any more popular amongst anyone at all.
So there he is at the Western wall, meeting religious Jews. And he is the least popular person in the world. But somehow this gives succour to those that follow the religion? It is pure Hubris, there is no soul searching involved. The arrogance is filtered down through the ranks to the army of hegemonists. As sympathisers, friends and well wishers diminish by the day.
No doubt his failing policies are well understood, but his supporters who write his policies want to show him the way out with solidarity, before they try to inflate a successor.
Religion with politics means war with Iran, and puppet politicians from the same family. Religion in business, means institutionalising consumerism, speculative investors, brand loyalty and seemingly no benevolence for nature or the world at large.
Speculative capitalism is collapsing. The rise of the east where the tradition is every man becomes a monk and goes out and begs for a period in youth is on the rise. Judaism says help the world by helping your family, those that fail or identify with people at large, are shunted to the dregs.
As Tony Karon recently pointed out (Rootless Cosmopolitan: Israel is 60) the idea was to be a nation that is a light onto others.
The Palestinians recently asked that Bush get their women and children released from Jail. He is such a tainted soul. But such type of thinking is what is needed, Rabin would have heard them.
Is the religion a spiritual quest or a policing organisation?

Iraq - the mistakes

The Iraq war could have been won.
If there had been more troops.
If there had not been an internet.
If the Baathists would have been left in power.
If the people were not taken as human shields.
If there had not been torture.
If there hadn’t been indiscriminate bombing.
If mercenaries and contractors weren’t used.
If the clans were allowed to run themselves.
If noone said, ‘bring em on’
If you hadn’t forgot why you went there.
Which was to then go for Iran.
There were so many lies, no one knew what they were there for.

Dear Israel, What’s the logic?

Dear Israel, What’s the logic?

Bad press everywhere, every day, defying the international will.
You can have a Jewish country within the 67 borders.
You can share Jerusalem.
And thereby garner a lot of international sympathy.
Instead there is a daily stream of horrifying news.
You say, ‘no one will help us if it all goes wrong’.
You are losing support by the minute. The atrocities are piling up. And there can only be more on the way.
Does anyone in Israel believe it is now possible to conquer all and everyone?
The Jews in the 30’s were easy to fight, they had no war like militancy. Like the Moslems from the 40’s to the 80’s.
You’ve raised a nation of people obsessed with the holocaust and a sense of divinity.
If you put your faith in the Iranians you’d be better off than putting it in the White House.
Remember Nixon (with the infamous Kissinger) made peace with China,
Something has got to give. There are now so many enemies, you can’t subdue them all.
And the Diaspora who is supporting your hard line. They might survive, even if you don’t.
Who wants to die for someone else?
The clock is ticking.
And you have become easy to manipulate. It is so certain you will overeact to everything.

Fascism Mirriam Webster

fascism

fas·cism

Pronunciation:

\ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi-\

Etymology:

Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces

Date 1921

1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control ….

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism

US stability in Iraq?

There’s so much talk of the US’ inability to stabalize Iraq. To say that that is the barometer of success.
Is that why it had the Mahdi army confronted in Basra recently?
Was that the idea behind Fallujah?
It seems far more likely that the intellegentsia in the field are more driven by revenge and subordination.
The shakers and movers on the ground see more profit in ensuring mayhem.
It’s like having a built in 5th column.
The same in Israel.
It is the people who are attracted to conquering, that get the jobs of conquering.
A bit of mayhem in business might work, or maybe over a smaller agrarian community that isn’t accustomed to fighting, but maybe not in war.

Respect your own!

The danger of fooling your own people is it makes you believe you can fool others.
The political powers in the West have been able (through the media) to manipulate their populations towards any ‘righteous’ cause. If need be, through a false flag operation. The people in power, who are in fact hidden and behind the politicians can implement wars and rely on a servitude and loyalty for the flag.
This creates the illusion that other countries will do the same. Not so, the Iranian revolution is a good example, as are all the other lost ventures, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Venezuela, indeed all places that are considered adversarial.
So its a narcissistic downfall. The Oligarchy drunk with their ability to rely on a nations nationalism (herd instinct). Assumes a foreign people will be equally malleable.
The outcome is going to be a kind of world revolution, similar to the collapse of the Soviet Union. Then one country after another fell, and rid itself of communism.
Next, ridding ourselves of speculative capitalism.

Does withdrawal mean no more war?

We call it spin, they call it a ruse.
When listening to the ‘insurgents’ (otherwise known as freedom fighters) retell their combat experiences. They (and GIs similarly) tell of false decoys, and false baits. In otherwords insincerity, albeit on the battlefield. Here in the west where it is relatively less physically violent, we are set up, entrapped, in some way fed fear, punished in the family and generally fed lies. We call it spin.
The danger now is that some of those wholeheartedly calling for the withdrawal of forces from Iraq, are in fact thinking they could be redeployed to Afganistan and Pakistan and who knows where else. Maybe the 67 borders? Maybe out of Iran’s way, or to Taiwan, Korea etc etc …

Insurgent accounts can sometimes be found here or here .

Russian intelligence sees U.S. military buildup on Iran border

From RIA NOVOSTI

Russian intelligence sees U.S. military buildup on Iran border
17:31 27/ 03/ 2007

The above link from what really happened , where there is some commentary.

Some of Kissinger in yesterdays Asia Times

Bush and Bin Laden’s virtual war

By Mark Danner

The realist case was well summarized, once again, by Kissinger, who, when asked by a Bush speechwriter why he supported the Iraq war, replied: “Because Afghanistan wasn’t enough.” In the conflict with radical Islam, he went on, “They want to humiliate us and we have to humiliate them.”

www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JC28Ak04.html

…
US moves towards engaging Iran
By M K Bhadrakumar

Kissinger, incidentally, is a foreign policy advisor to the Republican Party’s presidential nominee, Senator John McCain. For the first time, Kissinger called for unconditional talks with Iran. That is a remarkable shift in his position.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JC27Ak04.html