Divining the News (DTN)

Is the resignation of the UK counter terrorist Police chief a ploy to take the headlines away from the police mishandling of the G20 protests?

Was any sensitive info actually divulged?

Wouldn’t any photographer at no 10 be accredited, and be previously scanned by security?

And there is an official secrets act. Or might one of those photographers be an Al-Qaeda mole? Unlikely.

All the news headlines now, instead of targeting the G20 police, are focused on the anti terror police chief, and for those with no interest in current affairs, they might well think that justice has been done for whatever the hooplala was about.

Far fetched, paranoid, or a recognition of the brains behind running a country?

And to encapsulate the killing of two birds with one stone, a blogger shows the MSM:

Under the appropriate title:

oops … let’s terrorize some more muslims, eh?

Police chief’s blunder forces terror officers to mount ‘al-Qaeda’ swoops
Gerri Peev, Scotsman, Apr 9 2009
A major terrorism operation was launched last night after a security blunder forced police to swoop on suspects who sources claim have links to al-Qaeda. Sources said the raids, in the north-west of England, were brought forward after Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Bob Quick was photographed clutching sensitive documents as he arrived in Downing Street. Hundreds of police officers raided addresses …

If you read the rest of the above excerpt you will see some terrorizing stuff; “a machinegun pointed right into his head”

Since this publication the counter terror chief has resigned.

So the psychological message is:

Police should not reveal their plans

HatTip rense for the pic above

.

.

Also see:

Iraq the Genocide, also Monsanto’s rule

Video: The world according to Monsanto — Banned in the USA

Honey for the Waste Incinerator

Monsanto’s Bt Cotton Kills the Soil as Well as Farmers

Shareholders ask Monsanto to defend US constitution. Iraqi farmers legally forced to use Monsanto seeds. Ex director advises Obama

Monsanto in law

.

Monsanto is heavily involved in Europe too.

http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-40379-2.html

.

From 2001:

The Earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses. – Utah Phillips

Appendix 1: UK Locations:
Monsanto UK Ltd. (PBIC) The Maris Centre 45 Hauxton Rd. Trumpington Cambridge CB2 2LQ England tel. 01223 849200 www.monsanto.co.uk www.monsanto-ag.co.uk registered office for Monsanto UK Ltd
Monsanto UK Ltd. Tulip House, 70 Borough High St. London SE1 1XF England tel. 020-7864-9913 This is the company’s government and public affairs office. This is a small office (maybe just a couple of desks) in a large office building housing a number of different companies.
Monsanto PLC PO Box 53 Lane End Road, High Wycombe Bucks. HP12 4HL
Monsanto PLC appears to be a remnant of old Monsanto/Pharmacia, the company has no employees and is registered at Pharmacia’s UK head office. It has two directors: Philip Greenhalgh and JG Lee. ⁷³

From: http://archive.corporatewatch.org/genetics/commercialisation/monsanto.htm#strategy

At the best of times there must have been CCTV in the heart of the Financial area in the City of London.
Especially on the day of protests, and so near the Bank of England, with thousands of police on duty.

Granted, the assault on Ian Tomlinson was just one of hundreds or thousands on that day. But still wouldn’t / shouldn’t the CCTV footage have been scrutinised? By whoever was investigating? Well it was the City of London Police investigating, but no longer.

Well looking around the net, I see Craig Murray saying the same thing:

Let me be quite plain. I do not believe that there was no official footage of the police assault on Ian Tomlinson. Just as the security cameras in Stockwell station and on the train were “Not working” in the Jean Charles De Menezes case, I accuse the Police of subverting the video evidence.

So thank God for that American tourist – and thank God he went to the Guardian rather than to the Police. If unanswerable video evdence had not now been produced, what lies do you think we would now be being told?  –Craig Murray–

.
On a separate post of Craig Murray:

While is it not al little strange that the police were unable to deploy anyone outside the Royal Bank of Scotland to prevent this massive crowd of, err, five people and 28 press photograpers from breaking the windows, but were able to pre-position a police photographer inside to video it?
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3455/3404568155_1ec4776a64.jpg

It stinks.

–Craig Murray–

Witness account:

There is a new video with extra footage of the police forming a line around Ian Tomlinson as he is laying motionless waiting for the ambulance (and maybe already dead).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYM3KOByTDw

Isn’t it a sign of the times? Afghanistan, Pakistan, Lebanon, Gaza …

The innocent suffering the most. He was not even a protester!

To Finish with – to emphasis  the injustice and mockery of justice – more of Craig Murray (An ex British Ambassador):

All of which leads me to resurrect this bit I wrote in a comments thread in reply to someone asking why I hadn’t mentioned the possibility of agents provocateurs:

There was a fascinating and drawn out scene outside the Bank of England yesterday when a distinct group of some thirty were attacking the police, one hitting the police with a long pole. Prominent was a group of young Asian lads.

I recognised them because I was crushed up hard for a good while against the same bunch of young Asians outside the Israeli Embassy a couple of months ago, where again they were being inexcusably violent.

The very strange thing was that, plainly from Sky’s overhead cam, the Police had the ability to isolate and snatch this group of obviously violent individuals, and the police would have had my support in doing so. But they didn’t.

So who are they?

–Craig Murray–