Divining the News (DTN)

From Tikun Olam, A movement for universal spirituality, and quite critical of Israel’s policies.

http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/

http://www.survival-international.org
Link seen at http://www.whatreallyhapppened.com

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1022822/Incredible-pictures-Earths-un
contacted-tribes-firing-bows-arrows.html

Largest Swiss Newspaper (Blick) Asks if Bush Was Behind 9/11

(translated from German into English, but not yet published online in English)

2,973 humans died with the attacks of 9/11. “Bin Laden” and “Al Qaeda”, the Bush clan cried. The world believed themm. In the meantime even scientists doubt the Bush version. Now, Swiss university professors Albert A. Stahel and Daniele Ganser raise new questions.

“Something is not correct”, says strategy expert Stahel in “World Week”, and here he refers to the “incomplete” official US Government 9/11 Report of 2004.

The university professor confirms his criticism in BLICK: “Osama Bin Laden cannot be ‘the large godfather’ behind the attacks. He did not have enough means of communication”.

Dr. Stahel doubts that a passenger airliner crashed into the Pentagon: “For trainee pilots it is actually impossible to crash into the building so exactly. Seven hours after the Twin Towers collapsed, the World Trade Center Building 7 next to it also collapsed. The official version: It burned for a long time. Nothing at all is clear.”

Raising questions along with Stahel is historian Dr. Daniele Ganser, his colleague at the University of Zurich. Dr. Ganser also calls the official US version “a conspiracy theory”.

“There are three theories, which we should treat equally”:

1. “Surprise theory” – Bin Laden and Al Qaeda implemented the attacks.

2. “Let it happen on purpose” – The US Government knew the Al Qaeda plans and did not react in order to legitimize a series of wars.

3. “Made it happen on purpose” – The attacks were actually planned and orchestrated by the Pentagon and/or US secret services.

Ganser: “3,000 humans were sacrificed for strategic interests. The more we research, the more we doubt the Bush version. It is conceivable that the Bush government was responsible. Bush has lied so much already! And we already know that the US government planned an operation in 1962 Operation Northwood that was approved by the Pentagon that would have sacrificed innocent US citizens for the government’s own interests.”

As for Ganser and Stahel: “We only ask questions.”

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/

http://www.iraq-war.ru/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=165917

Expect more …

McClellan was the White House spokesman, now he has released a book with some telling tales about Bush. The media are picking up on the revelations that Bush misled the country to war because of the false Intel on Iraq’s WMD program.

Now if you want to get a job as a spokesperson for a company, you will need to sign a non disclosure contract. If you want to work at the upper echelons of government, you will need to be cleared by the secret service and abide by any official laws on confidentiality and official government secrets.

The secret service also have their unwritten and unseen ways of enforcement.
There is also no way to have something published in the West in secret.
Don’t you think McClellan’s book was first vetted by the secret service? So why is he publishing the derisory knowledge of Bush?

First of all it negates the need for an enquiry into whether Bush made the evidence to fit the policy. Now that it is public knowledge.

It is now clear to everyone there is likely to be a call for an investigation into Bush’s Iraq debacle. And doesn’t McClellans revelation defuse what would have been far worse if it were revealed through a court. So it is all designed and measured, as Bush’s sun sets, let’s call it damage limitation.

There is a debate going on about whether the solution for Israel is a one or two state solution. Both Avnery and Olmert (just a few days ago) have said this. One state might mean not having to withdraw the settlements. This is what Rabin Peres were doing 15 years ago. But with the clear realisation that the majority population would soon be Arab, something would need to be done to insure an ethnic western majority (or as in the South African situation, the colonisers remain in charge of business).

Allowing non Jews to immigrate is an option, it would also be a way for Israel to say thank you to its US non Jewish friends that have been loyal. There is a risk of Israel and the US going in different directions anyway. Think of it like when the US left Vietnam or Iran, natives that were loyal to the US also went to the US. so now those that were loyal to Israel would also be allowed to immigrate to Israel. It would take care of the demography problem (too many Arabs) It would cater to so-called Christian Zionists, it would revitalize the empty immigration to Israel. Finally it would prevent a massive anti Israeli backlash from the recession headed US. Because there would be so many US citizens in Israel too.

With regard to allowing non Jews: How many of Israels population is anyway assimilated. Even if they think they are not. Put them next to a Lubavitcher and they look assimilated. This would also prevent Israel being hijacked by the large Russian community, which in the absence of US support is a possibility.

If such a radical rethink is going on, we could also get some pleasant surprises in the way of social and family law reforms.

If the US won in Iraq it would mean more wars.
It would be the proof that imperialistic wars can work.

The US would continue selling it’s wealth to the highest bidder. And the military industrial complex would pursue more profit and adventures.
All the contractors like Halliburton, would dictate foreign policy. And furnish the presidents speechwriters.

They must assume foreign resources can feed the US population.
It seems true the US casualty rate is diminishing. But they are official figures. There are plenty of resistance videos circulating showing attacks that are never reported.

Not that I look at them, once is enough.

Imagine the big wigs trying to make strategic decisions, when the economic system is tottering.

There must be plenty of dissent at the top. There must also be 60 and 70 year old men who have never known any other way to be other than to conquer.
In conclusion, the likelihood of the US reaaching a peaceful occupation inIraq seems like zero. Israel still has armed resistance amongst a proportionally much smaller enemy, and that is after 60 years. And Syria, Iran or any other adversary can always up the armed ante.

Carter was just the only one to present, there wasn’t any alternative. When it became clear the white house was but a lot of banditos, and that they don’t have a clue. The only ‘elder’ to offer sanity was Carter. Whatever he is doing is measured, he is not trying to scupper anything, just to do some healing.

When he mentions Israel’s arsenal, it is with intention (either to calm them, or to bring them to the negotiating table).

Let’s be grateful for Carter’s presence. We at least know he wants peace.

Microsoft was probably more preeminent around a decade ago. Then the Netscape browser appeared and Microsoft tried everything it could to catch up, it took them more than a year to be on a par with Netscape. Around Internet Explorer 3 although it was called something different then.

And so it is with the world and the powerful. They made calculations without the internet in mind. A lot of mankind is joining the dots on the net.

Neither the world nor Microsoft could believe the little upstart Netscape.

And similarly now, the authorities cannot contend with the sheer volume of people exchanging information. Now people are examining the conspiracies. Never before could the media be bypassed, and a free joining with other people. A colossal amount of people on the net, all adding to one jigsaw puzzle or another.
All the truths will out.

Egypts recent unrest was publicised through the Social Networking site: Facebook.
rss.wn.com/English/related-articles/ 2008/05/03/Food_price_crisis_bites_in_Egypt/

Ron Paul collected record amounts of donations from joe public on the internet.

Jewish looking at Ron Paul?
The news about Ron Paul’s relatives helping him in his campaign means he is gaining approval from the religious to continue. The Washington Post ran an article on this yesterday. And the subject has been picked up everywhere.

I wish him a happy family.

These days the mainstream media represents the ruling elite. And the family is the cornerstone of our society (and it is true). Public figures need to qualify, and set an example.
Bush to son, Clinton to wife.

Ron Paul is also making the same statement by having his family work for him.

Moving on, Ron Paul intends to dismantle and do away with the Federal Reserve. That in itself is a revolution.The internet has publicised the knowledge about Fiat money (not backing the currency with anything, like Gold for example) and that the Fed is privately owned.

As everyone is saying, America has lost its economy, it is very ripe for a (peaceful) revolution.
With Nepotism as a banner it will please everyone. Religion and family are the same thing. That’s a good formula: all the revolution you want, but not including religion.

Jews have their constraints, how Liberal can they be, and get away with it. The more successful they are professionally, the more likely they can voice an opinion. If they have an independent income, like an artist does for example.

The Zionist/Jewish system is very hierarchical and can be severe. If a person is not so talented as to pick an individualistic career, then he or she is very dependent on others, their boss and colleagues. In the tight knit world of trickle down capitalism, there is a lot of room for financial reward and punishment.

Most people on a clear night under the stars with no noise would see the glaring injustices being done in the name of the Jews.

But on the inside, it is tyrannical, and the fervour of loving God is also in the nation building. To summarise: risk losing your job and income if you support Palestinian liberation.
What follows are a couple of extracts about what constitutes “support” from a Jew.

Solidarity from “Pro-Palestinian” Jews Revisited
by Ibrahim Alloush

The question remains, however, what actually constitutes support for the Palestinian cause: sympathy with the victimization of Palestinians, like one would sympathize with road kills for example, conscious political support for a platform for liberation, or something in between?
[...]

Nevertheless, not everyone who claims to support us is actually a supporter. Many such supporters actually oppose some of the most crucial things we stand for, except they dislike some of the human rights violations that the Zionists are visiting upon us. That is, they: 1) recognize the right of “Israel” to exist and the alleged right of Jews to settle in Palestine, 2) they oppose our strategy to liberate Palestine, and 3) they especially oppose the armed struggle of Palestinian organizations. Such ‘supporters’ are not actually supporting us, but simply trying to make themselves feel better..

The next extract really captures the flavour of the Jewish empire, and really it also exists in the diaspora, it is the surreptitious pressure applied to a Jew. A Jew is as likely to feel as mentally imprisoned as a Palestinian. Constantly guilt tripped, at least about not exclaiming enough pride in Judaism, or else you are a “self hating Jew”, and that is the same thing that the authour is saying here:

Frequently Palestinians are set up in a guilt trip. They have to prove that they do not hate Jews. The proving really never ends until you eventually embrace the doctrine of “Israel’s” security.